The ongoing legal saga between Manchester City and Premier League has garnered significant attention and criticism. Former Crystal Palace owner Simon Jordan added his voice to chorus of disapproval.
Speaking on talkSPORT’s White and Jordan show. Jordan did not mince words in expressing his disdain for City’s actions. These he described as “abhorrent” and “outrageous.”
Genesis of dispute lies in City’s legal challenge against Premier League’s associated party transaction (APT) rules. These are viewed by the club as unfairly targeting their success. This move by City is seen by many as confrontational and disruptive. It has drawn sharp rebuke from Jordan. He characterized it as an attempt to circumvent established regulations and undermine integrity of league.
Simon Jordan: Throw Them Out of the Premier League
According to Simon Jordan, the legal maneuvering by City constitutes nothing short of bullying. He believes the club is leveraging financial clout to assert dominance and evade accountability. He criticized City for resorting to litigation instead of engaging in constructive dialogue. Jordan also believes City disrespects democratic processes of league.
Jordan’s condemnation extends beyond the legal dispute itself. He perceives City’s actions as symptomatic of broader trend of self-interest prevailing over collective welfare of football.
Moreover, Simon Jordan expressed incredulity at the language employed by City in framing grievances. He found their characterization of APT rules as “discriminatory” problematic. Decrying the “tyranny of majority” further reflects misunderstanding of democratic principles. Jordan argues that such rhetoric serves to obfuscate City’s accountability in adhering to regulations.
In calling for strongest possible response from Premier League, Jordan advocates for punitive measures commensurate with severity of City’s transgressions. He contends that expulsion from league would send a clear message about consequences of flouting established norms. It would serve as a deterrent against similar actions in future.
However, Simon Jordan acknowledges practical challenges associated with implementing such drastic sanctions within existing regulatory framework. While expulsion may not be feasible under current rules, he maintains that it represents the appropriate moral stance against City’s perceived misconduct.
In sum, Jordan’s scathing critique underscores deep-seated concerns surrounding City’s legal battle with Premier League. It raises broader questions about balance of power and accountability in modern football governance.
